Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 09:43
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Has anyone liked being made a cocksucker?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What if the girl says that drama about you dating here? Is that a bad sign?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Pain relief breakthrough as scientists discover a safer, non-addictive approach - Earth.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Why do men love to stink/being smelly?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
The growing popularity of gaming's surprise hit - gardening - BBC
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
If you could instantly cancel one social norm, what would it be?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Tesla Stock Is Falling. Why June Is Starting With a Loss. - Barron's